Back
Back
70% of Sales Reps Quit After One Email. Here's What Happens If You Don't.
The Day 2, 5, 9, 14 sequence that triples response rates
Oct 26, 2025


Most sales reps give up after one email.
That's a mistake.
Research shows that campaigns with 4-7 follow-up emails are nearly 3x more likely to get responses than campaigns sending only 1-3 messages.
But there's a science to sequencing. Send too many emails too quickly, and you're a spammer. Wait too long between touches, and you're forgotten.
Here's the formula that works.
The Data Behind Persistence
SmartReach analyzed over 100,000 cold email campaigns and found:
Email 1: ~18% response rate
Email 6: ~27% response rate
Yet according to Propeller CRM, nearly 70% of sales reps give up after just one email.
The math is brutal: by quitting early, most reps leave responses on the table.
But persistence alone isn't enough. Each follow-up needs to add value. A sequence of "just checking in" emails will annoy prospects and damage your sender reputation.
The Day 2, 5, 9, 14 Framework
Based on SmartReach and Propeller research, here's the optimal spacing:
Email 1: Day 0 (Initial outreach)
Email 2: Day 2 (Quick follow-up)
Email 3: Day 5 (Value add)
Email 4: Day 9 (Objection handling)
Email 5: Day 14 (Break-up)
Why These Intervals?
Day 2: Strike while you're still in their recent memory. Too soon (next day) feels desperate. Too late (week+) and they've forgotten you.
Day 5: Give them time to process. They might have opened your first email but not acted. This touch reinforces without overwhelming.
Day 9: Enough time has passed that a new angle feels appropriate. This is where you add new value or address potential objections.
Day 14: The break-up email. Polite, respectful, and surprisingly effective.
Email-by-Email Breakdown
Email 1: The Hook
Objective: Grab attention, establish relevance, soft CTA
Structure:
Personalized opening (site signal or recent news)
Value proposition tied to their pain
Soft CTA (interest-based, not commitment-based)
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Noticed Acme's Series B announcement—congrats! Scaling outbound with a growing team can get messy fast. We help SaaS companies personalize outreach at scale without sacrificing quality. One similar company cut prospecting time by 60%. Worth exploring? [Name]"
CTA style: Soft ("Worth exploring?" / "Interested in learning more?")
Email 2: The Reminder + Value
Objective: Resurface gently, add new value
Structure:
Acknowledge the previous email briefly
Offer something useful (resource, insight, benchmark)
Soft-to-medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Quick follow-up on my note from Tuesday. I put together a benchmark on outbound response rates in B2B SaaS—thought it might be useful given your growth phase. Want me to send it over? [Name]"
CTA style: Still soft but slightly more specific ("Want me to send it over?" / "Would a quick overview help?")
Email 3: Social Proof
Objective: Build credibility, introduce proof points
Structure:
Lead with a micro-case study or result
Connect it to their situation
Medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, A VP of Sales at a company similar to Acme told me their biggest challenge was personalizing at scale without burning out their SDRs. After implementing AI-assisted research, they booked 35% more meetings while cutting prep time in half. Open to a 15-minute call to see if this fits your situation? [Name]"
CTA style: Medium ("Open to a 15-minute call?" / "Does a quick chat next week work?")
Email 4: Objection Handler
Objective: Address likely reasons for silence
Structure:
Acknowledge you might be off-base
Preempt common objections
Offer flexibility
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I realize I might be reaching out at the wrong time—Q1 is brutal for sales teams. If timing is the issue, happy to reconnect next quarter. If budget is the concern, most of our clients start with a small pilot before scaling. Either way, let me know what makes sense. [Name]"
Common objections to address:
Timing: "Happy to revisit next quarter"
Budget: "We offer flexible options / pilot programs"
Not the right person: "If there's someone better to speak with, I'd appreciate a point in the right direction"
Already have a solution: "Understood—many of our clients switched from [competitor] when they needed [differentiator]"
CTA style: Flexible ("Let me know what makes sense" / "What would be helpful?")
Email 5: The Break-Up
Objective: Create closure, trigger response through finality
Structure:
Acknowledge persistence
Offer to stop
Leave door open
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I've reached out a few times and haven't heard back—no worries at all. I'll assume the timing isn't right and won't follow up further. If things change down the road, feel free to reach out. Wishing you a strong Q1. [Name]"
Why break-up emails work: SmartReach data shows break-up emails achieve response rates as high as 33%. The psychology is simple: scarcity and finality prompt action. By signaling you're walking away, you remove pressure and trigger a response.
CTA style: None (or very soft: "If things change, reach out")
CTA Laddering Strategy
Notice how CTAs progress through the sequence:
E1: Soft — "Worth exploring?"
E2: Soft+ — "Want me to send it over?"
E3: Medium — "Open to a 15-minute call?"
E4: Flexible — "What would make sense?"
E5: Exit — "Feel free to reach out if things change"
This laddering prevents the common mistake of asking for too much too soon. You earn the right to a harder ask by providing value first.
Personalization Tapering
Another key principle: personalization intensity should decrease through the sequence.
E1-E2: Heavy personalization (site signals, recent news, role-specific insights)
E3-E4: Moderate (industry trends, role-based challenges)
E5: Minimal (clean, simple, human)
Why taper? Repeating the same personalization feels robotic. By E3-E4, shift focus to value and social proof rather than proving you did research.
Timing Best Practices
Based on SmartReach and Propeller data:
Best days: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday
Best times: 10-11 AM or 2-4 PM (recipient's local time)
Worst times: Monday morning (inbox overload), Friday afternoon (weekend brain)
Vary your send times across the sequence. If E1 goes out at 10 AM Tuesday, try E2 at 2 PM Thursday.
Stop Conditions
Know when to stop:
Positive reply: Pause sequence, engage
Negative reply: Remove from sequence immediately
Opt-out request: Remove and respect instantly
No reply after E5: Move to long-term nurture (monthly check-in) or remove
Never send more than 5 emails in a sequence without any engagement signal.
Common Mistakes
1. "Just Checking In" Syndrome
Every follow-up should add value. "Wanted to bump this to the top of your inbox" is not value.
2. Same Message, Different Day
Each email needs a different angle: value, proof, objection handling, break-up.
3. Too Aggressive, Too Fast
Daily emails = spam folder. Respect the spacing.
4. No Break-Up Email
Many reps stop at E3-E4. The break-up email often gets the best response rate. Don't skip it.
5. Ignoring Time Zones
Sending at 10 AM your time doesn't help if the prospect is 8 hours ahead.
Conclusion
Follow this formula, and you'll outperform the 70% of reps who give up after one email.
Sources: SmartReach 100k campaign analysis, Propeller CRM follow-up study, Woodpecker personalization research
Most sales reps give up after one email.
That's a mistake.
Research shows that campaigns with 4-7 follow-up emails are nearly 3x more likely to get responses than campaigns sending only 1-3 messages.
But there's a science to sequencing. Send too many emails too quickly, and you're a spammer. Wait too long between touches, and you're forgotten.
Here's the formula that works.
The Data Behind Persistence
SmartReach analyzed over 100,000 cold email campaigns and found:
Email 1: ~18% response rate
Email 6: ~27% response rate
Yet according to Propeller CRM, nearly 70% of sales reps give up after just one email.
The math is brutal: by quitting early, most reps leave responses on the table.
But persistence alone isn't enough. Each follow-up needs to add value. A sequence of "just checking in" emails will annoy prospects and damage your sender reputation.
The Day 2, 5, 9, 14 Framework
Based on SmartReach and Propeller research, here's the optimal spacing:
Email 1: Day 0 (Initial outreach)
Email 2: Day 2 (Quick follow-up)
Email 3: Day 5 (Value add)
Email 4: Day 9 (Objection handling)
Email 5: Day 14 (Break-up)
Why These Intervals?
Day 2: Strike while you're still in their recent memory. Too soon (next day) feels desperate. Too late (week+) and they've forgotten you.
Day 5: Give them time to process. They might have opened your first email but not acted. This touch reinforces without overwhelming.
Day 9: Enough time has passed that a new angle feels appropriate. This is where you add new value or address potential objections.
Day 14: The break-up email. Polite, respectful, and surprisingly effective.
Email-by-Email Breakdown
Email 1: The Hook
Objective: Grab attention, establish relevance, soft CTA
Structure:
Personalized opening (site signal or recent news)
Value proposition tied to their pain
Soft CTA (interest-based, not commitment-based)
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Noticed Acme's Series B announcement—congrats! Scaling outbound with a growing team can get messy fast. We help SaaS companies personalize outreach at scale without sacrificing quality. One similar company cut prospecting time by 60%. Worth exploring? [Name]"
CTA style: Soft ("Worth exploring?" / "Interested in learning more?")
Email 2: The Reminder + Value
Objective: Resurface gently, add new value
Structure:
Acknowledge the previous email briefly
Offer something useful (resource, insight, benchmark)
Soft-to-medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Quick follow-up on my note from Tuesday. I put together a benchmark on outbound response rates in B2B SaaS—thought it might be useful given your growth phase. Want me to send it over? [Name]"
CTA style: Still soft but slightly more specific ("Want me to send it over?" / "Would a quick overview help?")
Email 3: Social Proof
Objective: Build credibility, introduce proof points
Structure:
Lead with a micro-case study or result
Connect it to their situation
Medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, A VP of Sales at a company similar to Acme told me their biggest challenge was personalizing at scale without burning out their SDRs. After implementing AI-assisted research, they booked 35% more meetings while cutting prep time in half. Open to a 15-minute call to see if this fits your situation? [Name]"
CTA style: Medium ("Open to a 15-minute call?" / "Does a quick chat next week work?")
Email 4: Objection Handler
Objective: Address likely reasons for silence
Structure:
Acknowledge you might be off-base
Preempt common objections
Offer flexibility
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I realize I might be reaching out at the wrong time—Q1 is brutal for sales teams. If timing is the issue, happy to reconnect next quarter. If budget is the concern, most of our clients start with a small pilot before scaling. Either way, let me know what makes sense. [Name]"
Common objections to address:
Timing: "Happy to revisit next quarter"
Budget: "We offer flexible options / pilot programs"
Not the right person: "If there's someone better to speak with, I'd appreciate a point in the right direction"
Already have a solution: "Understood—many of our clients switched from [competitor] when they needed [differentiator]"
CTA style: Flexible ("Let me know what makes sense" / "What would be helpful?")
Email 5: The Break-Up
Objective: Create closure, trigger response through finality
Structure:
Acknowledge persistence
Offer to stop
Leave door open
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I've reached out a few times and haven't heard back—no worries at all. I'll assume the timing isn't right and won't follow up further. If things change down the road, feel free to reach out. Wishing you a strong Q1. [Name]"
Why break-up emails work: SmartReach data shows break-up emails achieve response rates as high as 33%. The psychology is simple: scarcity and finality prompt action. By signaling you're walking away, you remove pressure and trigger a response.
CTA style: None (or very soft: "If things change, reach out")
CTA Laddering Strategy
Notice how CTAs progress through the sequence:
E1: Soft — "Worth exploring?"
E2: Soft+ — "Want me to send it over?"
E3: Medium — "Open to a 15-minute call?"
E4: Flexible — "What would make sense?"
E5: Exit — "Feel free to reach out if things change"
This laddering prevents the common mistake of asking for too much too soon. You earn the right to a harder ask by providing value first.
Personalization Tapering
Another key principle: personalization intensity should decrease through the sequence.
E1-E2: Heavy personalization (site signals, recent news, role-specific insights)
E3-E4: Moderate (industry trends, role-based challenges)
E5: Minimal (clean, simple, human)
Why taper? Repeating the same personalization feels robotic. By E3-E4, shift focus to value and social proof rather than proving you did research.
Timing Best Practices
Based on SmartReach and Propeller data:
Best days: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday
Best times: 10-11 AM or 2-4 PM (recipient's local time)
Worst times: Monday morning (inbox overload), Friday afternoon (weekend brain)
Vary your send times across the sequence. If E1 goes out at 10 AM Tuesday, try E2 at 2 PM Thursday.
Stop Conditions
Know when to stop:
Positive reply: Pause sequence, engage
Negative reply: Remove from sequence immediately
Opt-out request: Remove and respect instantly
No reply after E5: Move to long-term nurture (monthly check-in) or remove
Never send more than 5 emails in a sequence without any engagement signal.
Common Mistakes
1. "Just Checking In" Syndrome
Every follow-up should add value. "Wanted to bump this to the top of your inbox" is not value.
2. Same Message, Different Day
Each email needs a different angle: value, proof, objection handling, break-up.
3. Too Aggressive, Too Fast
Daily emails = spam folder. Respect the spacing.
4. No Break-Up Email
Many reps stop at E3-E4. The break-up email often gets the best response rate. Don't skip it.
5. Ignoring Time Zones
Sending at 10 AM your time doesn't help if the prospect is 8 hours ahead.
Conclusion
Follow this formula, and you'll outperform the 70% of reps who give up after one email.
Sources: SmartReach 100k campaign analysis, Propeller CRM follow-up study, Woodpecker personalization research
Most sales reps give up after one email.
That's a mistake.
Research shows that campaigns with 4-7 follow-up emails are nearly 3x more likely to get responses than campaigns sending only 1-3 messages.
But there's a science to sequencing. Send too many emails too quickly, and you're a spammer. Wait too long between touches, and you're forgotten.
Here's the formula that works.
The Data Behind Persistence
SmartReach analyzed over 100,000 cold email campaigns and found:
Email 1: ~18% response rate
Email 6: ~27% response rate
Yet according to Propeller CRM, nearly 70% of sales reps give up after just one email.
The math is brutal: by quitting early, most reps leave responses on the table.
But persistence alone isn't enough. Each follow-up needs to add value. A sequence of "just checking in" emails will annoy prospects and damage your sender reputation.
The Day 2, 5, 9, 14 Framework
Based on SmartReach and Propeller research, here's the optimal spacing:
Email 1: Day 0 (Initial outreach)
Email 2: Day 2 (Quick follow-up)
Email 3: Day 5 (Value add)
Email 4: Day 9 (Objection handling)
Email 5: Day 14 (Break-up)
Why These Intervals?
Day 2: Strike while you're still in their recent memory. Too soon (next day) feels desperate. Too late (week+) and they've forgotten you.
Day 5: Give them time to process. They might have opened your first email but not acted. This touch reinforces without overwhelming.
Day 9: Enough time has passed that a new angle feels appropriate. This is where you add new value or address potential objections.
Day 14: The break-up email. Polite, respectful, and surprisingly effective.
Email-by-Email Breakdown
Email 1: The Hook
Objective: Grab attention, establish relevance, soft CTA
Structure:
Personalized opening (site signal or recent news)
Value proposition tied to their pain
Soft CTA (interest-based, not commitment-based)
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Noticed Acme's Series B announcement—congrats! Scaling outbound with a growing team can get messy fast. We help SaaS companies personalize outreach at scale without sacrificing quality. One similar company cut prospecting time by 60%. Worth exploring? [Name]"
CTA style: Soft ("Worth exploring?" / "Interested in learning more?")
Email 2: The Reminder + Value
Objective: Resurface gently, add new value
Structure:
Acknowledge the previous email briefly
Offer something useful (resource, insight, benchmark)
Soft-to-medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, Quick follow-up on my note from Tuesday. I put together a benchmark on outbound response rates in B2B SaaS—thought it might be useful given your growth phase. Want me to send it over? [Name]"
CTA style: Still soft but slightly more specific ("Want me to send it over?" / "Would a quick overview help?")
Email 3: Social Proof
Objective: Build credibility, introduce proof points
Structure:
Lead with a micro-case study or result
Connect it to their situation
Medium CTA
Example:
"Hi Sarah, A VP of Sales at a company similar to Acme told me their biggest challenge was personalizing at scale without burning out their SDRs. After implementing AI-assisted research, they booked 35% more meetings while cutting prep time in half. Open to a 15-minute call to see if this fits your situation? [Name]"
CTA style: Medium ("Open to a 15-minute call?" / "Does a quick chat next week work?")
Email 4: Objection Handler
Objective: Address likely reasons for silence
Structure:
Acknowledge you might be off-base
Preempt common objections
Offer flexibility
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I realize I might be reaching out at the wrong time—Q1 is brutal for sales teams. If timing is the issue, happy to reconnect next quarter. If budget is the concern, most of our clients start with a small pilot before scaling. Either way, let me know what makes sense. [Name]"
Common objections to address:
Timing: "Happy to revisit next quarter"
Budget: "We offer flexible options / pilot programs"
Not the right person: "If there's someone better to speak with, I'd appreciate a point in the right direction"
Already have a solution: "Understood—many of our clients switched from [competitor] when they needed [differentiator]"
CTA style: Flexible ("Let me know what makes sense" / "What would be helpful?")
Email 5: The Break-Up
Objective: Create closure, trigger response through finality
Structure:
Acknowledge persistence
Offer to stop
Leave door open
Example:
"Hi Sarah, I've reached out a few times and haven't heard back—no worries at all. I'll assume the timing isn't right and won't follow up further. If things change down the road, feel free to reach out. Wishing you a strong Q1. [Name]"
Why break-up emails work: SmartReach data shows break-up emails achieve response rates as high as 33%. The psychology is simple: scarcity and finality prompt action. By signaling you're walking away, you remove pressure and trigger a response.
CTA style: None (or very soft: "If things change, reach out")
CTA Laddering Strategy
Notice how CTAs progress through the sequence:
E1: Soft — "Worth exploring?"
E2: Soft+ — "Want me to send it over?"
E3: Medium — "Open to a 15-minute call?"
E4: Flexible — "What would make sense?"
E5: Exit — "Feel free to reach out if things change"
This laddering prevents the common mistake of asking for too much too soon. You earn the right to a harder ask by providing value first.
Personalization Tapering
Another key principle: personalization intensity should decrease through the sequence.
E1-E2: Heavy personalization (site signals, recent news, role-specific insights)
E3-E4: Moderate (industry trends, role-based challenges)
E5: Minimal (clean, simple, human)
Why taper? Repeating the same personalization feels robotic. By E3-E4, shift focus to value and social proof rather than proving you did research.
Timing Best Practices
Based on SmartReach and Propeller data:
Best days: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday
Best times: 10-11 AM or 2-4 PM (recipient's local time)
Worst times: Monday morning (inbox overload), Friday afternoon (weekend brain)
Vary your send times across the sequence. If E1 goes out at 10 AM Tuesday, try E2 at 2 PM Thursday.
Stop Conditions
Know when to stop:
Positive reply: Pause sequence, engage
Negative reply: Remove from sequence immediately
Opt-out request: Remove and respect instantly
No reply after E5: Move to long-term nurture (monthly check-in) or remove
Never send more than 5 emails in a sequence without any engagement signal.
Common Mistakes
1. "Just Checking In" Syndrome
Every follow-up should add value. "Wanted to bump this to the top of your inbox" is not value.
2. Same Message, Different Day
Each email needs a different angle: value, proof, objection handling, break-up.
3. Too Aggressive, Too Fast
Daily emails = spam folder. Respect the spacing.
4. No Break-Up Email
Many reps stop at E3-E4. The break-up email often gets the best response rate. Don't skip it.
5. Ignoring Time Zones
Sending at 10 AM your time doesn't help if the prospect is 8 hours ahead.
Conclusion
Follow this formula, and you'll outperform the 70% of reps who give up after one email.
Sources: SmartReach 100k campaign analysis, Propeller CRM follow-up study, Woodpecker personalization research
Are you ready to convert more leads into customers?
Join 1000+ agencies, startups & consultants closing deals with Convert CRM
Are you ready to convert more leads into customers?
Join 1000+ agencies, startups & consultants closing deals with Convert CRM
Are you ready to convert more leads into customers?
Join 1000+ agencies, startups & consultants closing deals with Convert CRM
Latest posts
Discover other pieces of writing in our blog




